Re(3): AVS: das leisten moderne Hi-End Objektive: Nikon 14-24 vs. Canon & Rest der WW-Welt: Wahnsinn!
Geizhals » Forum » Foto & Video » AVS: das leisten moderne Hi-End Objektive: Nikon 14-24 vs. Canon & Rest der WW-Welt: Wahnsinn! (41 Beiträge, 545 Mal gelesen) Top-100 | Fresh-100
Du bist nicht angemeldet. [ Login/Registrieren ]
AVS: das leisten moderne Hi-End Objektive: Nikon 14-24 vs. Canon & Rest der WW-Welt: Wahnsinn!
19.03.2008, 12:02:49
http://www.16-9.net/lens_tests/canon14l2_nikon1424/nikon1424_canon14l2_a.html
http://www.16-9.net/lens_tests/nikon1424_17mm/nikon1424_17mm1.html
http://www.16-9.net/lens_tests/nikon_14_24mm_1/nikon14_24mm_b.html

Nikon (mit Adapter!) an Canon 1Ds III versus das neue Canon 14/2.8 L II (nicht das alte I!!). Schärfe, Kontrast, CAs, Verzerrung -> Sieger in allen Punkten: das Nikon. Nikkor vs. das neue Canon 16-35 L II (nicht das alte Ier) - detto. Ach ja, das Nikkor verbläst auch sonst alles was von Olympus, Canon und Contaxt weitwinkelig ist - natürlich Festbrennweiten und liegt auf dem Level des legendären Zeiss Distagons 21mm! 8-O

Es ist unglaublich und widerspricht allen Weisheiten, die noch vor wenigen Jahren eingefleischtes Fotografen-"Wissen" waren. ;-)

Wissensstand März 2008:
1. (Die besten) neue(n) Zooms können auch die besten (neuen!) Festbrennweiten verblasen.
2. Neue Objektive sind schon bei Offenblende praktisch perfekt
3. Im Moment ist Nikon bei Hi-End im WW Canon deutlich (!) überlegen

--------------------------------------------------------------------------
Resumee des Testers (wohlgemerkt ein Canon-1Ds III und 5D User, also zwar ein "equipment-flexer" [c r'n'r] aber sicher kein Nikon-Fanboy!):

Wonderful. At 14mm, the Nikon 14-24mm gives us a whole new level of performance: it's not so much that it rewrites the rules, it doesn't seem to be aware of what the rules are . . . sharp, vignette-free corners at 14mm / f2.8? No problem! With performance this good at f5.6, I think we've just found a lens that may challenge the Leica 15mm f2.8 for the title of ultimate ultrawide. Without question, this lens is at least as good as the Zeiss 15mm f3.5.

So what we appear to have, at first glance, is a Zeiss 15mm + Canon 24 L in one lens for a bargain $1800. In overlapping focal lengths, it's better than the Nikon 17-35mm, Canon 17-40mm, 16-35mm II, and even, I suspect, the Contax N 17-35mm f2.8 zooms. More than that, it looks like it might better than every prime in that range: you can forget the Tamron 14mm, Sigma 14mm, Canon 14mm Mark I, Zeiss, Nikon and Leica 15mm f3.5, Tokina 17mm, Olympus 18mm, Zeiss 18mm, Nikon 20mm and Olympus 21mm variants.

But is it better than the Leica 19mm? Easy – yes: superb colouring v superb colouring, but the Nikon has better corners.

Is there a better 24mm lens? Maybe – but not by much. The 24L is pretty special, and two stops faster, so it's unlikely to be dethroned in the near future. But the Nikon zoom is as good as anything else you can use at this focal length.

Is is better than the Leica 15mm f2.8? Ah – good question! Can I get back to you on that when my 1Ds III arrives? It may be the only tool capable of giving us an answer.

Is it better than the Zeiss 21mm? Oooh, now you're asking . . . perhaps not. But we'd have to define 'better' better: is it as high resolution? Perhaps not – though given the fact that the Nikon comes very close to outresolving the 5D in the corners makes this something of a moot point. Colour? Zeiss – just: but the Nikon glass draws very similarly. Distortion? At 21mm, no contest: the Nikon is much better. Flare and ghosting? Nikon (just) again . . . .

Is it perhaps the most impressive wide angle lens ever by a huge margin? Yes, and yes again. Run – really, run to your local dealer and buy one as fast as you can. Then sell all those other lenses it replaces and treat yourself to a case of Chateau d'Yquem with the proceeds.
-------------------------------------------------------------------


19.03.2008, 12:04 Uhr - Editiert von iraki, alte Version: hier
Antworten PM Alle Chronologisch
 
Melden nicht möglich
.  Re: Crop-Sortiment Nikon vs. Canon  (iraki am 19.03.2008, 16:46:45)
.  Weil es gerade so gut dazu passt ...  (Alpenländer am 21.03.2008, 11:09:00)
..  Re: Weil es gerade so gut dazu passt ...  (Tom@33 am 21.03.2008, 19:19:27)
 

Dieses Forum ist eine frei zugängliche Diskussionsplattform.
Der Betreiber übernimmt keine Verantwortung für den Inhalt der Beiträge und behält sich das Recht vor, Beiträge mit rechtswidrigem oder anstößigem Inhalt zu löschen.
Datenschutzerklärung